image image image image image image image image
Future of Veterinary Education
Read the Full Story
Results & Challenges
Read the Full Story
Veterinary Education 2012
Read the Full Story
Ideas and actions
Read the Full Story
What did we learn?
Read the Full Story
New direction?
Read the Full Story
Wiki Community Builds Tutorials
Read the Full Story
Building Momentum
Read the Full Story
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Introduction

Customize. With these tools we can build an extremely powerful and customizable collaborative framework. It does not matter if we prefer a flat organization or a more structured one with a strong hierarchy, if we want focus on strong central or dispersed local development; it does not matter which business model we prefer – we can have it all.
Perhaps most importantly, in each part of the network we can have a completely unique set of features – customized specifically for given country, school or even department or course --yet all those unique entities can work together, creating super-productive organization.

Greater efficiency and effectiveness. Numerous experts have been stressing the need “to revisit and reorganize the delivery of veterinary education by making use of new collaborative technology for greater efficiency and effectiveness” (Bernardo, 2006) and to do so as soon as possible (Eyre, 2010).

Difference! What can make a big difference between previous plans and future ones is that now we have at our disposal the well-developed tools necessary to make it happen.

Veterinary leaders have been constantly investing in the future of veterinary education. Over the last 30 years, more than seven national studies on the future of veterinary education and many more action plans have been conducted.

Those efforts are culminating now with the most comprehensive effort ever undertaken: The North American Veterinary Medical Education Consortium (NAVMEC), launched in 2009, and the action plan the Consortium is preparing.

Most Popular Videos

  • Feature Image
    The AVMA encourages the use of sound science to characterize veterinary medical waste . Full Story | Video
  • Feature Image
    Educational technology in medical education Full Story | Video
  • Feature Image
    A wiki is a website that allows the creation and editing of web pages via a browser. Full Story | Video
  • Feature Image
    Becoming a Veterinarian, Part 1: Join the Team! Video
  • Feature Image
    Ohio State University Veterinary Hospital Website | Video
  • Feature Image
    Learn to Change, Change to Learn Full Story | Video
  • Executive Summary 1

    Community Hub. The new Moodle Learning Management System, Moodle 2.0, comes with the finalized Community Hub Framework. Through this Community Hub, users from all participating institutions can easily find courses or communities of practice of all the partners in their network.  It supports a single-sign-on option so students and teachers can roam from one school’s Moodle installation to another ‘s (subject to permission, of course). Also, educators from different institutions can collaborate on course development or share course templates.

    Central and local management. Moodle and the Community Hub Framework provide a strong environment for local and centralized development and management. Each institution member of the Veterinary Community Hub can have one or more independent Moodle sites and multiple institutions can use the same Moodle installation. Therefore, each institution can join the network without fear that they will lose their sovereignty, yet numerous institutions (with absolute control over their local settings) can collaborate together, creating an extremely productive central organization.

    Four years ago, Dr. Bernardo (2006) wrote:

    • New means of collaborating to organize, share, and impart knowledge are proliferating and will be brought to bear on education, research, and service. We will have the tools at hand; we must also inculcate the necessary behaviors to operate more successfully in the future.

    Today we have those tools at hand. For example: (check Community Hub)

    Up-to-date models. Researchers suggest that we need up-to-date models to create outstanding results in the Web 2.0 era. We should not rely on traditional business and collaborative models from “the Pre-Web 2.0 Era.” Those tools were created for the pre-Internet world and cannot deliver the desired results in 2011.
    The perfect time to make a change. As veterinary professionals, we—much like our society, our students, our customers and partners — know that change is needed, and everything we need is well-developed and ready to use. As William Gibson so wonderfully noted, "The future is already here; it’s just not evenly distributed yet." In our context, that means that all the tools and practices we need have been created; we just need to connect and distribute them in the field of veterinary education.

    The time has come. There is a strong consensus that we have to take significant steps “to ensure that veterinary medical education meets the needs of our changing society.”  The North American Veterinary Medical Education Consortium is preparing an ambitious action plan to make this happen.

    Tools to make it happen. While preparing, promoting and producing these important changes, the following tools may be helpful:

    • A strong, up-to-date, easy -to-use technological framework;
    • Up-to-date collaborative practices that can significantly improve collaboration outcomes while saving  time;
    • Business models that will make such change sustainable.

    Executive Summary 2

    Building momentum around a clear and shared vision, well-planned actions, collaboration and the involvement of stakeholders and leaders at all levels while being innovative, flexible, open and outcome-oriented can significantly increase the success of a project.

    Sustainable improvement. To make the changes sustainable, we may consider strategic changes in: the technological framework, the business model, quality control, the organizational structure, partnerships, and administrative and academic procedures.

     

    The new collaborative world of 2.0 is significantly different from the pre-Internet era. Therefore, traditional business models can have only limited success in this environment.  Instead, the new business model, Freemium, has created new economic giants such as Google and Facebook, and is a very useful part of business strategy used by such schools as MIT, Yale, Harvard and Open University. Of course, our goal should not be the development of a new Google or a new Wikipedia, but the combining of classic, proven academic practices with new, ultra-productive Web 2.0 features.
    Freemium and the academic community. Freemium is deeply rooted in the academic community.  For example, academics regularly publish their research results – for free.   Although academics share the most valuable part of their work for free, premium services, such as teaching, consultancy or grants, can generate significant revenue.

    Online Collaboration, Openness, Peering, Sharing, and Acting Globally have become recognizable characteristics of global success. Google, Wikipedia, and Facebook on the Internet, and schools, such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard and Yale, are among the most well-known examples.
    Changing the way we do things is always a challenging task. However, we now have numerous good examples, a big population of users who already employ new practices, and powerful and easy-to-use tools.  Finally, it is becoming obvious that with new tools, we can reduce information overload (e.g. 20 e-mails per day), while increasing knowledge production.

    ePortfolio and academic social networking. Mahara, an open source ePortfolio and social-networking Web application, already used by a few veterinary schools, is a new addition to the Moodle family.

    Options. It provides users with tools to create and maintain a digital portfolio of their learning from their very first pre-veterinary course to advanced achievements in their veterinary careers.

    Mahara also has social-networking features to allow users to interact with each other, with schools, and with employers and recruiters.

    Traditional structure and Web 2.0 options. The Moodle Learning Management System provides a structured environment where everything can be monitored and controlled.

    At the same time, Moodle 2.0 is an integral part of the Web 2.0 environment.

    Therefore, with Moodle 2.0, we can combine the best of both worlds to create a customized combination that will fit our needs.

    Building Momentum

    Building momentum around possibilities

    Building momentum around possibilities
    Building momentum around shared vision, well-planned actions, collaboration and involvement of stakeholders and leaders at all levels -- while being innovative, flexible, open and outcome-oriented...
    Full Story

    Drivers for change

    Universities and veterinary schools exist within political, cultural and social contexts that shape their policy and practice (Hammond, 2003). That context shapes three main drivers: Economic...
    Full Story

    Mobilizing Global Network

    The global network provides significantly more options than a regional network.  Niall Sclater, director of Learning Innovation at the Open University concluded (Bierhals, 2009): “It wouldn't...
    Full Story

    Eight Ways to Build Collaborative Teams

    Building collaborative teams is a challenging task in any environment. That is why it is important to have a framework that provides the possibility of ‘absolute independence’ if a member ...
    Full Story

    Case Studies

    Profile Information

    Application afterLoad: 0.000 seconds, 0.29 MB
    Application afterInitialise: 0.017 seconds, 1.00 MB
    Application afterRoute: 0.022 seconds, 1.58 MB
    Application afterDispatch: 0.124 seconds, 3.07 MB
    Application afterRender: 0.240 seconds, 5.29 MB

    Memory Usage

    5582552

    17 queries logged

    1. SELECT *
        FROM jos_session
        WHERE session_id = '39a79927ca47e8907790e8d578e1e494'
    2. DELETE
        FROM jos_session
        WHERE ( time < '1511062094' )
    3. SELECT *
        FROM jos_session
        WHERE session_id = '39a79927ca47e8907790e8d578e1e494'
    4. INSERT INTO `jos_session` ( `session_id`,`time`,`username`,`gid`,`guest`,`client_id` )
        VALUES ( '39a79927ca47e8907790e8d578e1e494','1511067494','','0','1','0' )
    5. SELECT *
        FROM jos_components
        WHERE parent = 0
    6. SELECT folder AS type, element AS name, params
        FROM jos_plugins
        WHERE published >= 1
        AND access <= 0
        ORDER BY ordering
    7. SELECT template
        FROM jos_templates_menu
        WHERE client_id = 0
        AND (menuid = 0 OR menuid = 1)
        ORDER BY menuid DESC
        LIMIT 0, 1
    8. SELECT a.id, a.title, a.alias, a.title_alias, a.introtext, a.fulltext, a.sectionid, a.state, a.catid, a.created, a.created_by, a.created_by_alias, a.modified, a.modified_by, a.checked_out, a.checked_out_time, a.publish_up, a.publish_down, a.images, a.attribs, a.urls, a.metakey, a.metadesc, a.access, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(':', a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug, CHAR_LENGTH( a.`fulltext` ) AS readmore, u.name AS author, u.usertype, g.name AS groups, u.email AS author_email, cc.title AS category, s.title AS section, s.ordering AS s_ordering, cc.ordering AS cc_ordering, a.ordering AS a_ordering, f.ordering AS f_ordering
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_content_frontpage AS f
        ON f.content_id = a.id
        LEFT JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        LEFT JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        LEFT JOIN jos_users AS u
        ON u.id = a.created_by
        LEFT JOIN jos_groups AS g
        ON a.access = g.id
        WHERE 1
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND a.state = 1
        AND (( cc.published = 1
        AND s.published = 1 ) OR ( a.catid = 0
        AND a.sectionid = 0 ) )
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        ORDER BY  f.ordering
        LIMIT 0, 1
    9. SELECT a.id, a.title, a.alias, a.title_alias, a.introtext, a.fulltext, a.sectionid, a.state, a.catid, a.created, a.created_by, a.created_by_alias, a.modified, a.modified_by, a.checked_out, a.checked_out_time, a.publish_up, a.publish_down, a.images, a.attribs, a.urls, a.metakey, a.metadesc, a.access, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(':', a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug, CHAR_LENGTH( a.`fulltext` ) AS readmore, u.name AS author, u.usertype, g.name AS groups, u.email AS author_email, cc.title AS category, s.title AS section, s.ordering AS s_ordering, cc.ordering AS cc_ordering, a.ordering AS a_ordering, f.ordering AS f_ordering
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_content_frontpage AS f
        ON f.content_id = a.id
        LEFT JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        LEFT JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        LEFT JOIN jos_users AS u
        ON u.id = a.created_by
        LEFT JOIN jos_groups AS g
        ON a.access = g.id
        WHERE 1
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND a.state = 1
        AND (( cc.published = 1
        AND s.published = 1 ) OR ( a.catid = 0
        AND a.sectionid = 0 ) )
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        ORDER BY  f.ordering
    10. SELECT id, title, module, position, content, showtitle, control, params
        FROM jos_modules AS m
        LEFT JOIN jos_modules_menu AS mm
        ON mm.moduleid = m.id
        WHERE m.published = 1
        AND m.access <= 0
        AND m.client_id = 0
        AND ( mm.menuid = 1 OR mm.menuid = 0 )
        ORDER BY position, ordering
    11. SELECT a.*, cr.rating_sum/cr.rating_count AS rating, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        LEFT JOIN jos_content_rating AS cr
        ON a.id = cr.content_id
        WHERE a.state = 1
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND s.id > 0
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND cc.access <= 0
        AND s.access <= 0
        AND (cc.id=47)
        AND (s.id=9)
        AND s.published = 1
        AND cc.published = 1
        ORDER BY a.ordering
        LIMIT 0, 4
    12. SELECT *
        FROM jos_users
        WHERE id = '62'
    13. SELECT count(a.id) 
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        WHERE a.state = 1
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND s.id > 0
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND cc.access <= 0
        AND s.access <= 0
        AND (cc.id=47)
        AND (s.id=9)
        AND s.published = 1
        AND cc.published = 1
    14. SELECT a.*, cr.rating_sum/cr.rating_count AS rating, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        LEFT JOIN jos_content_rating AS cr
        ON a.id = cr.content_id
        WHERE a.state = 1
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND s.id > 0
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND cc.access <= 0
        AND s.access <= 0
        AND (cc.id=48)
        AND (s.id=9)
        AND s.published = 1
        AND cc.published = 1
        ORDER BY a.ordering
        LIMIT 0, 3
    15. SELECT count(a.id) 
        FROM jos_content AS a
        INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
        ON cc.id = a.catid
        INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
        ON s.id = a.sectionid
        WHERE a.state = 1
        AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2017-11-19 04:58:14' )
        AND s.id > 0
        AND a.access <= 0
        AND cc.access <= 0
        AND s.access <= 0
        AND (cc.id=48)
        AND (s.id=9)
        AND s.published = 1
        AND cc.published = 1
    16. SELECT id, title, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(':', id, alias) ELSE id END AS slug 
        FROM jos_polls
        WHERE id = 15
        AND published = 1
    17. SELECT id, text
        FROM jos_poll_data
        WHERE pollid = 15
        AND text <> ""
        ORDER BY id

    Language Files Loaded

    Untranslated Strings Diagnostic

    None

    Untranslated Strings Designer

    None